Belief Revision and Progression of Knowledge Bases in the Epistemic Situation Calculus
نویسندگان
چکیده
Fundamental to reasoning about actions and beliefs is the projection problem: to decide what is believed after a sequence of actions is performed. Progression is one widely applied technique to solve this problem. In this paper we propose a novel framework for computing progression in the epistemic situation calculus. In particular, we model an agent’s preferential belief structure using conditional statements and provide a technique for updating these conditional statements as actions are performed and sensing information is received. Moreover, we show, by using the concepts of natural revision and only-believing, that the progression of a conditional knowledge base can be represented by only-believing the revised set of conditional statements. These results lay the foundations for feasible belief progression due to the uniquemodel property of only-believing.
منابع مشابه
Belief revision and projection in the epistemic situation calculus
This article considers defeasible beliefs in dynamic settings. In particular, we examine the belief projection problem: what is believed after performing an action and/or receiving new information? The approach is based on an epistemic variant of Reiter’s situation calculus, where actions not only have physical effects but may also provide new information to the agent. The preferential belief s...
متن کاملSays Who ? – Incorporating Source Credibility Issues into Belief Revision 1 CSE Technical Report 99 - 08
We discuss some belief revision theories and the implementation of some of them in SNeBR, the belief revision subsystem of the SNePS knowledge representation and reasoning system. The following guidelines are important to belief revision: 1. minimize information removal 2. retract less-plausible beliefs before more-plausible ones. Alterations to SNeBR that provide users with information to help...
متن کاملComputing multiple c-revision using OCF knowledge base
Belief revision is the process of revising epistemic states in the light of new information. In this paper epistemic states are represented in the framework of Spohn’s Ordinal Conditional Functions (OCF). The input is a consistent set of propositional formulas issued from different and independent sources. We focus on the so-called multiple iterated belief crevision recently proposed by Kern-Is...
متن کاملRule Based Updates on Simple Knowledge Bases
In this paper we consider updates that are specified as rules and consider simple knowledge bases consisting of ground atoms. We present a translation of the rule based update specifications to extended logic programs using situation calculus notation so as to compute the updated knowledge base. We show that the updated knowledge base that we compute satisfies the update specifications and yet ...
متن کاملEmbedding Revision Programs in Logic Programming Situation Calculus
Revision programs were introduced by Marek and Truszczynski to specify change in knowledge bases. In this paper we show how to embed revision programs in logic programs with situation calculus notation. We extend Marek and Truszczynski's approach to allow incomplete initial knowledge base and extend the rules of revision programs to depend both on the initial and the nal knowledge base. We show...
متن کامل